On 11 July 2026, in an open-source AI-visibility tracker, TypelessForm was present in all 12 of 12 checks across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude — a 100% presence score and a Unified Visibility Index of 92 out of 100. TypelessForm and the tracker are both built by the team at Webappski, so we measured our own product; we publish the full run openly precisely because the tool is inspectable.
This is the short version. The complete write-up — the engine-by-question matrix, the three-month trend, the honest caveats, and how to reproduce it against any brand — is published on the site of the team that built the tracker. Here is what the number means, and what it does not.
What was measured?
Twelve checks: four AI engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude) each answering three category questions about voice form filling. TypelessForm appeared in all twelve. Eleven were direct mentions inside the engine's answer; one (Claude, on the third query) was a citation-only appearance, where our domain was among the sources but not named in the prose.
The category questions were real buyer questions — "best voice form filling tools," "one-shot voice form filling for e-commerce," "multilingual voice form filling" — not searches for our brand name. Being named when the buyer has not yet decided is the point of the exercise.
Didn't you grade your own product?
Yes, and we say so plainly. Webappski builds TypelessForm and built the open-source tracker used here, so this is us grading our own homework. The reason it is worth publishing is that the tracker is open source — the queries, the scoring formula and the raw run are all inspectable, and anyone can install the same tool and re-run the measurement against any brand, including a competitor's.
What it does — and does not — prove
It proves that on the day and the queries we tested, an open, inspectable tool recorded TypelessForm at full presence across four AI engines. It does not prove sales, sign-ups or website traffic, and it is not a verdict on the whole market — a handful of queries is a signal, not a census. AI answers shift; a visibility score is a starting point, never a finish line.
Read the full open-source audit trail
The complete case study — every number traced to the run, the 33%-to-100% trend with its honest like-for-like caveat, the verbatim engine quotes, and a step-by-step on reproducing it yourself — is written up by the Webappski team here: From 33% to 100% in AI answers — the open-source paper trail.
